Special Initiatives - Aarohi Society
Aarohi Society · Uttarakhand · Item II.I Promoting Education
Target vs actual (% indicators)
Synthetic actuals with 95% CI bounds
OECD-DAC assessment (synthetic /5)
Results (all indicators)
| Indicator | Layer | Unit | Target | Actual | CI | Quality | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reach | Output | % | 80 | 63 | 1–1 | Quality cleared | C |
| Access | Output | % | 80 | 65 | 1–1 | Quality cleared | C |
| Service utilisation | Outcome | % | 80 | 54 | 1–1 | Quality cleared | C |
| Behaviour change | Outcome | % | 80 | 56 | 1–1 | Quality cleared | C |
| Asset functionality | Outcome | % | 80 | 58 | 1–1 | Quality cleared | C |
Qualitative evidence (6)
- FGDSynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityC
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."
- FGDSynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityC
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."
- KIISynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityC
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."
- KIISynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityC
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."
- KIISynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityC
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."
- Project caseletSynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityC
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."
Deviant / negative case
Assets (0)
- No assets logged.
Respondent composition (aggregated)
218 synthetic respondents · quality-cleared 218
- Women36%
- Men33%
- Non-binary / prefer not to say30%
- SC19%
- General17%
- ST17%
- Not reported22%
- OBC25%
- No96%
- Yes4%
- Rural100%
Programme indicators referenced (11)
- SPEC-01Reach · Output
- SPEC-02Access · Output
- SPEC-03Service utilisation · Outcome
- SPEC-04Behaviour change · Outcome
- SPEC-05Asset functionality · Outcome
- SPEC-06Institutional capacity · Outcome
- SPEC-07Inclusion · Outcome
- SPEC-08Outcome achievement · Outcome
- SPEC-09Value for money · Outcome
- SPEC-10Sustainability · Sustainability/Impact
- SPEC-11Unintended results · Sustainability/Impact
Recommendation for the Board
Redesign: Protect successful delivery elements and address the weakest implementation condition before the next funding cycle.
Finding: Outcome achievement is 68% with sustainability readiness at 68%.
Condition: Subject to validation with actual assessment evidence and management response