PC.55.2436Derived display label; distinct project name not provided in RFP Annexure ICPartially Achieved

Special Initiatives - North East Society for Agroecology Support (NESFAS)

North East Society for Agroecology Support (NESFAS) · Meghalaya · Item II.IV Livelihood Enhancement Projects

Period · To be confirmed

Schedule VII · Item II.IV Livelihood Enhancement Projects

Design tier · D

Beneficiary target

2,000

Reached 1,700

RFP prescribed

200

+34 enhancement

Planned intervention

234

Completed 227

Sample achievement

97%

Output achievement

100%

Outcome achievement

92%

Sustainability

74%

Comparison completed

Not in intervention denominator

FGDs / KIIs (min)

2 / 3

Assets verified

0 verified

CSR investment

N/A — verified financial data not supplied

Cost per beneficiary

N/A

Target vs actual (% indicators)

Synthetic actuals with 95% CI bounds

OECD-DAC assessment (synthetic /5)

Results (all indicators)

Indicator	Layer	Unit	Target	Actual	CI	Quality	Grade
Reach	Output	%	80	76	1–1	Quality cleared	C
Access	Output	%	80	78	1–1	Quality cleared	C
Service utilisation	Outcome	%	80	74	1–1	Quality cleared	C
Behaviour change	Outcome	%	80	76	1–1	Quality cleared	C
Asset functionality	Outcome	%	80	78	1–1	Quality cleared	C

Qualitative evidence (6)

FGDSynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityC
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."
FGDSynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityC
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."
KIISynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityC
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."
KIISynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityC
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."
KIISynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityC
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."
Project caseletSynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityC
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."

Assets (0)

No assets logged.

Respondent composition (aggregated)

227 synthetic respondents · quality-cleared 227

gender

Men37%
Women35%
Non-binary / prefer not to say28%

social Group

General23%
Not reported15%
ST23%
SC22%
OBC17%

pwd

No93%
Yes7%

rural Urban

Rural100%

Programme indicators referenced (11)

SPEC-01Reach · Output
SPEC-02Access · Output
SPEC-03Service utilisation · Outcome
SPEC-04Behaviour change · Outcome
SPEC-05Asset functionality · Outcome
SPEC-06Institutional capacity · Outcome
SPEC-07Inclusion · Outcome
SPEC-08Outcome achievement · Outcome
SPEC-09Value for money · Outcome
SPEC-10Sustainability · Sustainability/Impact
SPEC-11Unintended results · Sustainability/Impact

Recommendation for the Board

Medium6-12 monthsOwner · LIC HFL CSR + implementation partnerC

Sustain: Protect successful delivery elements and address the weakest implementation condition before the next funding cycle.

Finding: Outcome achievement is 92% with sustainability readiness at 74%.

Condition: Subject to validation with actual assessment evidence and management response