Charge for Change - Selco Foundation
Selco Foundation · Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland · Item IV.I Ensuring Environmental Sustainability, Ecological Balance
Target vs actual (% indicators)
Synthetic actuals with 95% CI bounds
OECD-DAC assessment (synthetic /5)
Results (all indicators)
| Indicator | Layer | Unit | Target | Actual | CI | Quality | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renewable-energy systems installed | Output | count | 54,400 | 44,608 | 1–1 | Quality cleared | B |
| System uptime | Output | days | 30 | 25 | 1–1 | Quality cleared | B |
| Service hours enabled | Outcome | days | 30 | 22 | 1–1 | Quality cleared | B |
| Electricity or fuel costs avoided | Outcome | INR | 16,027 | 11,940 | 1–1 | Quality cleared | B |
| Health, education, or community services enabled | Outcome | % | 80 | 62 | 1–1 | Quality cleared | B |
Qualitative evidence (6)
- FGDSynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityB
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."
- FGDSynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityB
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."
- KIISynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityB
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."
- KIISynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityB
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."
- KIISynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityB
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."
- Project caseletSynthetic stakeholder group· Access, outcomes and sustainabilityB
"Illustrative evidence pattern aligned with aggregate synthetic results."
Assets (2)
- Programme-relevant infrastructure / equipmentAssam, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland · MultipleVerified - syntheticFunc 80%
- Programme-relevant infrastructure / equipmentAssam, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland · MultipleVerified - syntheticFunc 98%
Respondent composition (aggregated)
495 synthetic respondents · quality-cleared 495
- Non-binary / prefer not to say30%
- Women38%
- Men32%
- ST19%
- SC19%
- General20%
- Not reported21%
- OBC21%
- No95%
- Yes5%
- Rural100%
Programme indicators referenced (10)
- CHAR-01Renewable-energy systems installed · Output
- CHAR-02System uptime · Output
- CHAR-03Service hours enabled · Outcome
- CHAR-04Electricity or fuel costs avoided · Outcome
- CHAR-05Health, education, or community services enabled · Outcome
- CHAR-06Beneficiary access · Outcome
- CHAR-07Estimated emissions avoided · Outcome
- CHAR-08Operator capacity · Outcome
- CHAR-09Maintenance funding · Sustainability/Impact
- CHAR-10Average downtime · Sustainability/Impact
Recommendation for the Board
Improve: Protect successful delivery elements and address the weakest implementation condition before the next funding cycle.
Finding: Outcome achievement is 72% with sustainability readiness at 95%.
Condition: Subject to validation with actual assessment evidence and management response